Asymptotic statements from the closed forms (no eigenvalue computation) gamma_3 = kappa_h g_inf(0) = 0.2527310099 g_inf([4, 0, 0]) * 4 pi kappa_h |x| = 1.019830 g_inf([8, 0, 0]) * 4 pi kappa_h |x| = 1.004108 g_inf([16, 0, 0]) * 4 pi kappa_h |x| = 1.000988 g_inf([6, 6, 6]) * 4 pi kappa_h |x| = 0.998451 (5.15) orders of the limits on the infinite cubic lattice (L -> inf first), anchor at 0, g1 = g2 = 1; c(r) as in mutual_cost.txt (a) midpoint (0,40,0), r << D: c(4->8)=+1.0341, c(8->16)=+0.9956 (c) midpoint at the anchor: c(8->16)=-3.1350, c(16->32)=-3.0272, c(32->64)=-3.0065 (b) x1=(3,0,0) fixed, x2=(3+r,0,0): 4 pi kappa_h r^2 [E12 - E12(r=inf)] -> -(x1-h).r_hat = -3: r=8: -2.2024, r=16: -2.5327, r=32: -2.7447, r=64: -2.8662 (5.23) a_mark on the infinite cubic lattice (L -> inf first), collinear: anchor 0, body d, d+1, source d+1+R'; prediction a_mark ~ (2 c_phi/Gamma_inf) (R/d)^2 with c_phi=1/kappa_a+gamma_3/kappa_h=1.681302, Gamma_inf=1.934033, R=R'+1/2, d->d+1/2 R'=3 d= 8: a_mark=+2.354491e-01 prediction=+2.947882e-01 ratio=0.7987 R'=3 d= 16: a_mark=+6.851490e-02 prediction=+7.823121e-02 ratio=0.8758 R'=3 d= 32: a_mark=+1.813394e-02 prediction=+2.016421e-02 ratio=0.8993 R'=3 d= 64: a_mark=+4.636675e-03 prediction=+5.119511e-03 ratio=0.9057 R'=6 d= 8: a_mark=+6.421039e-01 prediction=+1.016718e+00 ratio=0.6315 R'=6 d= 16: a_mark=+2.306867e-01 prediction=+2.698179e-01 ratio=0.8550 R'=6 d= 32: a_mark=+6.571165e-02 prediction=+6.954595e-02 ratio=0.9449 R'=6 d= 64: a_mark=+1.715213e-02 prediction=+1.765709e-02 ratio=0.9714 (5.24) a_bond on the infinite cubic lattice: pair (d,0,0),(d,2,0) -> translated by e_x, source (d+1+R',1,0) R'=3 d= 8: a_bond=+2.539632e-01 prediction=+3.239171e-01 ratio=0.7840 R'=3 d= 16: a_bond=+7.600590e-02 prediction=+8.727102e-02 ratio=0.8709 R'=3 d= 32: a_bond=+2.027305e-02 prediction=+2.258620e-02 ratio=0.8976 R'=3 d= 64: a_bond=+5.193783e-03 prediction=+5.740509e-03 ratio=0.9048 R'=6 d= 8: a_bond=+6.966915e-01 prediction=+1.117183e+00 ratio=0.6236 R'=6 d= 16: a_bond=+2.562273e-01 prediction=+3.009960e-01 ratio=0.8513 R'=6 d= 32: a_bond=+7.351920e-02 prediction=+7.789935e-02 ratio=0.9438 R'=6 d= 64: a_bond=+1.922696e-02 prediction=+1.979890e-02 ratio=0.9711 (5.27) mirror placement on the infinite cubic lattice (control): anchor 0, body at (d,0,0) and (d+2,0,0), source at (d+1,R,0); Delta g_s = 0 by reflection, so a_mark = -2 phi_bar/(g_s Gamma_bar) -> 2 [c_phi + g_inf((1,R,0))]/Gamma_inf as d -> inf R=3 d= 8: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+2.010e-03, a_mark=+1.763447, limit=1.765042 R=3 d= 16: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+5.541e-04, a_mark=+1.763986, limit=1.765042 R=3 d= 32: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+1.464e-04, a_mark=+1.764467, limit=1.765042 R=3 d= 64: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+3.769e-05, a_mark=+1.764746, limit=1.765042 R=6 d= 8: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+2.010e-03, a_mark=+1.751637, limit=1.752262 R=6 d= 16: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+5.541e-04, a_mark=+1.751348, limit=1.752262 R=6 d= 32: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+1.464e-04, a_mark=+1.751685, limit=1.752262 R=6 d= 64: Delta g_s=+0.0e+00, Delta phi_a=+3.769e-05, a_mark=+1.751954, limit=1.752262 (5.27) pair control on the infinite cubic lattice: anchor 0, source e_x, pair x_1,2=(d,+-t,0) translated by e_x, d=n^3, t=n^4; N=Dg_h(x1)+Dg_h(x2), D=Dg_s(xbar), H=Dg_h(xbar) at the midpoint xbar=(d,0,0) (differences by combined Bessel integrals); a_bond = (phibar1+phibar2) DeltaG12 / (2 Gbar12 Delta phibar) with DeltaG12=-N, Delta phibar=-g_s(D-H), g_s=1; predicted: N/D->0, H/D->1, N/(D-H)->1, m_r->0, a_bond -> -(c_phi-g_inf(e_x))/c_phi = -0.948811 n=2 d= 8 t= 16: N/D=1.5818e-01 H/D=0.774972 N/(D-H)=0.702914 (D-H)/(D-H directly)=1.000000 m_r=-1.6854e-02 a_bond=-0.669486 n=3 d= 27 t= 81: N/D=6.1634e-02 H/D=0.928500 N/(D-H)=0.862012 (D-H)/(D-H directly)=1.000000 m_r=-1.1028e-02 a_bond=-0.818555 n=4 d= 64 t= 256: N/D=2.8264e-02 H/D=0.969225 N/(D-H)=0.918405 (D-H)/(D-H directly)=1.000000 m_r=-5.8710e-03 a_bond=-0.871625 n=5 d= 125 t= 625: N/D=1.5017e-02 H/D=0.984126 N/(D-H)=0.946054 (D-H)/(D-H directly)=1.000000 m_r=-3.3358e-03 a_bond=-0.897726 n=6 d= 216 t= 1296: N/D=8.8640e-03 H/D=0.990783 N/(D-H)=0.961726 (D-H)/(D-H directly)=1.000000 m_r=-2.0414e-03 a_bond=-0.912545 (5.25) ring: a_mark for a body between anchor and source (d=10, d+1, source at d+1+3) -> 1 as L -> inf L= 32: a_mark=0.528868 L= 64: a_mark=0.811924 L= 256: a_mark=0.959032 L= 1024: a_mark=0.990075 L= 4096: a_mark=0.997538 (5.28) line, every comparison: a_mark from the ring closed forms (5.8), (5.11) at L=4096 against (5.28); anchor 0, source at 20 x= 12, x'= 11 (between anchor and source): a_mark ring=+0.997420 (5.28)=+1.000000 x= 21, x'= 19 (straddling the source): a_mark ring=+1.953142 (5.28)=+1.953333 x= 25, x'= 15 (straddling the source): a_mark ring=+1.766104 (5.28)=+1.766667 x= 5, x'= -7 (across the anchor): a_mark ring=-0.213945 (5.28)=-0.211538 x= 8, x'= -3 (across the anchor): a_mark ring=+0.491203 (5.28)=+0.489691 (5.13) anchored line (L = inf): w(d) and Sigma(d) from the resolvent (5.9); predictions w(10d)-w(d) -> ln10/(2 pi sqrt(kappa_h)), Sigma(d)/d -> 2 ln2/(pi kappa_h^{3/2}) d= 10: w=0.809467 Sigma/d=0.489480 Gamma=11.429 d= 100: w=1.157998 Sigma/d=0.446296 Gamma=101.429 w(d)-w(d/10)=0.348531 d= 1000: w=1.522451 Sigma/d=0.441776 Gamma=1001.429 w(d)-w(d/10)=0.364453 d= 10000: w=1.888714 Sigma/d=0.441322 Gamma=10001.429 w(d)-w(d/10)=0.366263 predictions: ln10/(2 pi)=0.366468, 2 ln2/pi=0.441271